|
PENTAGON VIDEO EVIDENCE SHOWS
FRAUD OF WAR ON TERROR
By David
Bosankoe, B.Sc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes in 2008
by Michael Irving: David Bosankoe's website
no longer appears to be available. I hope
David, himself, is okay. David Bosankoe,
B.Sc., carried out much scientific analysis
of various video stills. A very impressive
study. It is likely that his detailed
analysis is still available by being backed
up somewhere on the Internet. Some searches
may bring quick results.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A few months ago the American
Department of Defence released to the
World Media the five security-camera
(CCTV) frames that capture the attack on
the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia that
occurred on September 11, 2001.
These frames were broadcast across the
Internet News agencies where I was able to
pick them up and enlarge them, after which
I joined them together in a single
animation file which can be found on my
website at:
Eastman was expounding his theory of an
internally planted bomb and, to show him
his error I went to the BBC and did a
search for 'Pentagon' and found the CCTV
images. That's when I made my first
animation from the frames.
Shortly before, American investigator,
'Agent Fescado,' provided on the website,
www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html
his own analysis of the CCTV stills based
on evidence that included his own
enlargement of the first frame in the
sequence with added overlays of different
aircraft, using the position and size of
the tail fin of the actual attack craft
shown in the first frame as the reference
for determining scale and position of the
overlay.
THE REALITY: A MUCH SMALLER AIRCRAFT
What he found was that the profile of the
plane captured in the frame when compared
to the fitted overlay of a Boeing 757,
where the tail fin of the overlay is
fitted to exactly cover the visible fin of
the attack aircraft in the video, was far
shorter than a Boeing 757 (a rather
obvious observation which nevertheless I
later proved with mathematical rigor on my
web site). What Fescado also found
was a tail-fin fitted overlay of an F-16
made for a very reasonable fit, as also do
other small military aircraft such as S-3B
Viking (a craft which has been suggested
by one of Agent Fescado's sources as the
true Pentagon-attack culprit.).
Exactly which small military aircraft was
responsible for the attack, is a question
that must not distract from the
now-established finding that the Boeing 757
of Flight 77 was not the aircraft that the
CCTV visually captured, an aircraft which in
my estimation is less than half the length
of the 757.
Afterward, I found the Internet source for
the MSNBC Flash animation of the CCTV
images and extracted the Flash file out of
their page, allowing me to use the inbuilt
zoom function in Flash which includes a
pixel interpolation function so I could
quickly extract smoothed pictures. I've
explained how to trace my steps in all
this for you who want to 'do it yourself'
at:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/howto.htm
(not available unfortunately)
I then used a shareware version of Jasc
Animation Shop to string this together in an
'animated GIF' which so many have now seen
thanks to Dick Eastman.
When comparing proportions in the first
frame, the height of the Pentagon's wall, 70
feet, with the 155 feet length of the Boeing
757, it becomes blatantly obvious that
actual attack plane is far too short.
This finding led me to look at the size of
the hole that the plane made.
When the plane crashed into the Pentagon,
it first of all made merely a hole and,
only later, after fire crews had arrived
on the scene, did the outer wall of
Pentagon above this hole collapse.
Fortunately, someone who was on the nearby
freeway and passing the Pentagon during the
first moments of the attack had his camera
with him and managed to get some really good
shots of this hole (see my homepage:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/)
(not
available unfortunately)
Its size is surprising. I approximate it to
be between two and three meters across. Not
only was the hole too small for a Boeing 757
to have made, there was also an obvious lack
of plane wreckage. The wings were nowhere to
be seen. There was no luggage, seats, or
other debris that one expects from this type
of crash.
Later, I saw the damage report on the extent
of the internal damage. That too was
inconsistent with an mid-sized airliner
crash.
But that is just the beginning. In the first
CCTV image a white smoke trail is visible to
the right following the plane. However, the
problem with this is that jet contrails only
happen at high altitudes when the water
vapor from a jet's exhaust freezes into a
trail of visible ice crystals. So the only
explanation of this white smoke is that it
is the rocket-engine emission from a small
missile.
This conclusion is supported by evidence
in the second image, where the initial
fireball appears vividly as the flash
explosion consistent with a small missile
warhead. On two counts of visual evidence,
therefore, we see that a missile was
launched at the Pentagon by the attacking
plane.
STARTLING CONCLUSION,
AND: 'THE WAR ON TERROR'
So in conclusion, instead of knife-armed
terrorists with limited flight experience
hijacking a modern passenger plane and
flying it into the Pentagon at ground level,
we are forced to conclude that a military
jet with auto pilot capabilities flew into
to Pentagon, firing a missile just ahead of
impact.
Also remarkable is the choice of the point
impact, a point only metres away from the
only fire hydrant on that side of the
building. This was the hydrant for the
heliport, with underground tanks, in case of
helicopter crashes. (Again see my homepage.)
Whoever planned the attack likely was
thinking of damage limitation.
So, now knowing that the attack craft was
not a Boeing, it is abundantly clear to me
that the US Government has lied to us about
Sept 11th.
I can only conclude that they did the deed
themselves as a propaganda operation to
'justify' to the American people (and their
allies) their sought-for war against the
Taliban and their 'War on Terrorism'.
From other people's investigations it has
become clear that this was for oil and
opium and geopolitical gain, NOT to
liberate the brave suffering women of that
country (though, in itself a good cause,
it was used for propaganda purposes).
My own line of 911 research has been has
been restricted to the Pentagon attack.
However, I have added many links and
articles to my web site referencing
investigations parallel to my own,
including, especially, questions raised by
the World Trade Center attack.
There are many questions that the US
Government should be answering about that.
Among the most notable I can recall are
these:
"Why was there a big increase in insider
trading just before the attack?",
"Why were CEO's from the WTC invited to a
charity dinner at around 8am on the morning
of Sept 11 at an air base?", and
"Why did the twin tower collapse the way
they did (like a controlled demolition,
falling straight down and not toppling
over)?".
-----------------
DICK EASTMAN, at my request, has
provided
me with his own summary points:
===========
WTC/911 SUMMARY POINTS
BY DICK EASTMAN,
YAKIMA, USA
I. MOTIVES:
1. Getting the pipeline the Taliban had
rejected;
2. Control of the mineral wealth of
Afghanistan;
3. Generating a popular and sufficient
reason to attack Saddam Hussein (whom both
father and son Bush have long wanted to see
dead);
4. Continued sustainability of the infamous
"ring" of Afghan opium becoming Chinese
heroin becoming laundered revenue proceeds
becoming investment capital building new
Chinese industry forcing the relocation of
industry away from U.S. territory;
5. Big money for the FBI, CIA, military
industrial complex;
6. Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the
biggest-ever illegal oil swap case;
7. Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the
biggest-ever gold price fixing case (illegal
selling of Federal Reserve gold to elites at
way below obtainable market prices);
8. Getting the FBI off white collar and
bank crime (i.e. introducing total anarchy
to the sphere in which the U.S. investment
bankers, currency traders, derivatives
makers etc. operate);
9. Having the CIA ("Capitalism's Invisible
Army" as R. Buckminster Fuller called it)
take over the FBI (the more legitimate and
traditionally constitutional of Federal
investigation and intelligence agencies) and
in so doing purging the FBI of leadership
sympathetic with anti-globalist, populist,
nationalist, constitutionalist, or
pro-sovereignty thinking -- in fact it is
the druglords taking over the constabulary;
and, last,
10. Accomplishing pre-emptive war set-up
to look like retaliatory self-defence,
i.e., picking fights, against all
"potential" terrorists by setting-up the
those suspected of being capable of
resorting to terror, actually conducting
terror themselves so they can pin the
blame on those they want to decimate,
those who stand in the way of their
economic and geopolitical dominance.
II. REMOTE-CONTROL CRASHES:
EgyptAir flight 10.31.99 -- clear case of
remote-control take-over; data captured on
blackbox voice recorder and on instrument
recorder make it unmistakable that the plane
was taken over against the will of pilot and
co-pilot (a voice -- English, not Arabic,
actually is heard in the voice recorder
saying "control it" at the moment the
controls begin to misbehave -- the efforts
to refute this have only landed the
government in deeper in a coverup --
EgyptAir and the Egyptian government accept
this view and not the obviously cooked
findings of the U.S. review board.)
New York flight in Queens -- breaks up in
air -- after rudder begins moving first
right and left -- breaking off the tail fin
-- another whitewash by U.S. aviation
officials as well.
Miami Flight -- rudder goes wild on its own,
then stops. This was a "test" of the
remote-controlsystems.
Ron Brown's crash in Croatia -- same deal,
and then, to make sure Ron Brown got a
bullet in the head by the first "rescuers"
on the scene.
The Plane that hit the South WTC tower --
Note the Japanese video showing another
aircraft streak by at the moment of impact
-- presumably a guidance aircraft or a
missile to do the job in case the plane
missed its intended target. (There is very
little data on this besides the video
itself, so we tend to leave it alone, but
it is definitely part of the big picture.)
III. PENTAGON "SMALL JET"
This is the "smoking gun" that could finish
the crime syndicate responsible for 911 --
unfortunately the crime syndicate knows this
very well and the American people have
hardly begun to get the word.
1. DoD VIDEO -- the
Bosankoe evidence.
2. SMALL HOLE -- the French evidence and the
photo from the freeway.
3. WITNESS ACCOUNTS -- those who saw a
horizontal approach claim the plane was too
small to be a Boeing 757 -- many military
men who did not see said they heard a jet
fighter, some heard a missile.
4. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS claim plane
behaved like a military jet.
IV. STAND DOWNS
1. INTELLIGENCE -- FBI prevented from
investigating (after merger with the CIA
they won't even try, btw)
2. AIR INTERCEPTIONS -- could have, but
didn't -- ordered not to -- many many
sources on this; many officials (Cheney,
Rumsfeld) caught in falsehoods
V. PHONEY BIN LADEN VIDEO
V. Phoney bin Laden video (Dick says: I have
lots of analysis of this that are on no site
that I know of -- I had forgotten this until
now).
VI: Evidence of prior planning and
attempts to enlist other nations in war
against Afghanistan pre-911 (Powell in
India, most especially; but many others).
AND THE LESSER STUFF:
Bush's behavior on the day and
subsequently.
Rice's statements before 911.
Wolfowitz lightening appraisal and
conclusion that war on Afghanistan is
necessary.
Economic links of Bush, Cheney etc. to
profiteering from exactly this war.
The short-sells and where they lead.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington State, USA.
E-mail: eastman@bentonrea.com
(Dick Eastman frequently has to change
e-mail addresses due to harassment.)
===========
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVE BOSANKOE, B.Sc.:
Note by World-Action: I think Dave
Bosankoe's website is no longer available,
but you may find some of this dedicated
scientist's work available at other
websites, or at an Internet archive site,
such as the Wayback online facility at:
http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
Here are David's references as originally
published with this article:
My home, including enlargements of the CCTV
frames and other analysis:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/
My archive of articles and related news
article links:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/keynews.htm
Links to other investigations into the US
Governments
complicity on September 11th and various
other related links:
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/links.htm
DAVID BOSANKOE, B.Sc., U.K.
http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9-11: THE ATTACK ON
TRUTH
|