|
The Amazing Shapes In The Fields

CROP-PATTERN
TAKE-OVER
CROP-PATTERN
COVER-UP
CROP-PATTERN
MESSAGES
CROP-PATTERN TAKE-OVER
Important note, July 2002:
NO authentic 'Crop
Patterns' since 1999?

'Crop Patterns' changed the
world, but...

Have All Crop Patterns Been Hoaxed From 2000 Onwards?


1999,
Wiltshire, England: I think this is one of the last, authentic Crop
Patterns.
Three,
interlocking crescents in a circle.
The crescent is
important to the HOPI.

By Michael Irving, owner of World-Action
and editor of Interesting Times

It is possible there have been
no authentic crop patterns since the end of 1999. In mid 1999, Isabelle
Kingston, a clairvoyant who lives in Wiltshire, England, and close friend
of Colin Andrews, and myself, told me that she and other sensitives had
been getting the idea or message that 1999 would be the last year in which
the real makers of the crop patterns would make any further crop patterns.

In the early 1990s, it was
clear there were forces around which were determined to undermine the
public's interest in the phenomenon of 'Crop Patterns'. It is said about
these opposition forces that they try to take over anything which gives us
hope, and make it their own. I think it is quite possible that during the
1990s they were perfecting their own technology to be able to create
impressive crop patterns by the use of stealth craft or from satellites.

I think ET/Spirit knew the
subject of crop patterns was about to be hi-jacked, and therefore they put
out the warning that they were ending their participation in 'Crop
Patterns' at the close of the season in 1999.

ET/Spirit had indicated to us
through the amazing Crop Patterns, we are not told the truth about the
world in which we try to exist. And due to the efforts of those agencies
and groups who worked hard in the early 1990s to discredit the whole
phenomenon, we now know there are definitely those who do not want us to
know the truth. I strongly believe ET/Spirit is now saying to all of us,
"It's now up to you."

"It's now up to you."
CROP-PATTERN COVER-UP
Intimidation of Main 'Crop
Pattern' Researchers

File 28: Appendix 01 Part 2 ---
Case Profile: Cosmic Top-X32
The CIA and the Crop Circles,
Pages: 279-287
'COSMIC TOP SECRET - The Unseen Agenda'
By Jon King, Editor of UFO Reality (UK)
1998/1999. New English Library. Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 0 340 70822 0
'THE CIA AND THE CROP CIRCLES'
[JK = Jon King, CA = Colin
Andrews]
JK: So, Colin. Can you think of
any other instances where government agents have become involved in the
crop circles research programme?
CA: Yes, yes, I can. One
instance in particular comes to mind. A man who announced himself as
working for the CIA back in, I think, June or July of 1989, approached me
and said he had been assigned to 'bring me into a plan', or more
precisely, 'buy me into a plan'. He said this was the sole reason he'd
come to England - that his assignment was to implement and execute this
plan in which I was to be involved.
JK: And did he tell you what
this plan was?
CA: He did, yes. He told me
that certain individuals, all of whom you know, Jon - Richard Andrews,
Terence Meaden, Pat Delgado, to name a few - he told me that the CIA were
about to promote each major researcher in turn and then publicly debunk
them. He said this was a ploy that was frequently used. He said they would
give them a stage, encourage them to declare their hand and, one by one,
take them out. He said that I would then be left with a 'role' that he
later revealed to me.
JK: How did this man make his
approach? How did he contact you?
CA: Well, when he first
arrived, Pat and I were asked to go up to Pebble Mill television studios
in Birmingham to take part in a programme called Daytime Live. It was a
kind of live TV debate situation. They were going to air the sequence that
contained the mysterious sound detected in a crop formation and recorded
by the BBC - the sound that destroyed a hundred thousand pounds' worth of
TV camera one sunny afternoon at a crop circle site in Wiltshire! As we
came on air, they were running this particular sequence.

Anyway, on the morning of the
programme we were in our hotel, and we received a phone call from David
Morgenstern of the BBC who said that they had received some communication
from a man who claimed he had actually seen a crop circle being formed,
and what questions should they ask that would allow them to know if he was
telling the truth? So we gave them some questions that we thought would be
helpful. When we arrived at the studios we were told that this man had
been flown directly in to Birmingham and that we would not be able to meet
him because they wanted it to be an absolutely first-time contact on air.
As we came on air they panned to the studio audience, and this man
described what he'd seen, live on TV.
JK: What exactly did he say?
CA: That he'd been out studying
foxes in Scotland, and that one of the foxes on this particular night had
refused to follow its regular path which, he explained, was not consistent
with the usual behaviour of foxes. I don't know if this is right or not,
but it sounded plausible. The fox apparently refused to go any further and
instead went back the way it had come. The man then apparently heard some
rustling, and then he described the way this circle formed. What he was
saying is that the fox had presumably sensed something strange and that
after it had scampered off he witnessed the formation of this circle. But
the point is that his live TV appearance seemed to legitimize him.
JK: You think this was his way
of becoming accepted on the crop circle scene?
CA: Right. From that moment on
his being seen in the presence of the crop circle researchers - myself and
Pat in particular - became acceptable. It was his 'way in', so to speak.
JK: So what happened next?
CA: Well, some weeks later
there was a rap on my door, and when I answered it I immediately
recognized the man standing there. It was the 'fox-study' man. He said
that he'd come to tell me something ... he wanted me to get Pat Delgado
over to my place because he wanted to talk to both of us.

Pat lived about seventeen miles
away. It was late at night but I phoned him and he agreed to come over.
When he arrived the man spent all evening into the early hours with both
of us, asking question after question. He appeared to be comparing the
answers I gave against those that Pat gave. Well, perhaps not
surprisingly, Pat eventually grew more and more frustrated, and said to
the man: 'Look, exactly what have you come to tell us?' But the man just
shook his head, as if to say: 'I'm not ready to tell you yet.' So Pat just
stood up and said something like: 'Well, I've got better things to do with
my time,' and headed out the door and went home. He was very angry.

The guy accompanied me to the
door to see Pat out (I didn't know whether he was going to leave as well -
I was rather hoping he would, because I was pretty bloody angry about it,
too) but as Pat left and I closed the door the man just spun round on me
and said: 'Get your jacket on. I want to tell you something.'

So against my better judgement
I went through into the front room and told my wife I was popping out for
a few minutes (I wanted to tell her so she didn't become worried). We then
went out.
JK: Where did you go at that
time of night?
CA: We wandered down towards
Andover town centre, then back up Salisbury Road, back and forth, back and
forth, questions and more questions, most of a fairly general nature, but
none of the questions were about me. Rather they were to do with things
like, you know: Where were the circles? Who were we in touch with? What
did we know, particularly about the Russians? That kind of thing. He was
asking every question you could possibly think of that an intelligence
agent would probably ask. But the conversation wasn't going anywhere at
all. As for myself I was furious, but I didn't quite have the courage to
walk away.
JK: But presumably at some
point he told you what it was he'd come to tell you?
CA: Yes. When we eventually
started to walk back towards my home he stopped on the pavement and said:
'You are now one of us.' So I said: 'What do you mean by that?' He said,
simply: 'CIA.' When I asked him for ID he just laughed and said: 'You
really think a CIA agent would carry identification?' And then he laughed
again.

He told me I would never see
his boss, and that he never saw his boss's boss. He said that was the way
it worked. He said that from here on in I was 'one of them'. He gave me no
say in the matter whatever. He never asked me if I wanted to be associated
with the CIA - he just told me that from then on I was to consider myself
one of them.

Following this he named a lot
of people - most of whom were my colleagues in crop circle research - who
were to be eliminated from the research programme (he did not mean that
they were to be killed or anything quite like that, but they were
nevertheless to be taken off the stage, so to speak). And they have been.
I have watched the process in operation for some years now - a process he
openly told me about on that night. And every name he named that night has
since been 'got at', and everything that he said would happen has
happened.
JK: Could you give us an
example?
CA: Well, for instance, the
following year Terence Meaden was never out of the newspapers. Nobody else
could get a look in. This is exactly what he told me would happen. But
where is Terence Meaden now? Who knows what Terence Meaden's latest ideas
are? Answer: no one. Because, presumably, his stage has been taken from
him - he's been 'taken out'. Pat Delgado was next, and we all know what
happened to him.
[Author's note: sadly, Pat
Delgado was so taken in by the 'Doug And Dave' episode, and so distraught
because of it, that he retired from crop circle research soon thereafter.]

JK: Do you think there was a
reason why you weren't 'taken out', too? Did this man indicate why you
should be singled out from the rest?
CA: He did, yes. The CIA guy
told me that, so far as they were concerned, I seemed to have a particular
affinity and contact with the public. 'You have a way,' is what he said.
The public identify with you.'
JK: And at the time, of course,
you were getting a lot of media coverage.
CA: Yes, I was. There were
really only two people in those days, Pat and myself. We'd written a book
and it had sold a lot of copies. We were getting a lot of TV and radio
coverage. But a decision seemed to be made that night that I was the one.
I mean, if you look at it logically, it could have been either one of us.
So this man must have been in a position to make a decision. He must have
carried some authority within his agency.
JK: Right.
CA: So he chose me to go with
this 'role' ...
JK: And what was this 'role'?
CA: Once they had taken these
other researchers out of the frame, so to speak, they wanted me to do
something for them. He said I was to carry on being Colin Andrews,
researching the phenomenon, just doing my thing, and at some point in the
near future I would be asked to do one interview which would enjoy
maximum, saturated media coverage. During the course of this interview I
was to make one statement, and one statement only.

They wanted me to state
publicly that the crop circle phenomenon was a hoax. When we got back to
my home he said that he would show me how to say it and what to say. In
return for this I was offered a bank account in Switzerland, in which
would be enough money that I would never need to even think about money
ever again. On top of this he said that they were in possession of some
kind of 'instrument' which they would send to me within two weeks. He said
that this instrument would allow me to identify immediately a real crop
circle from a hoax - something that, presumably, could measure some or
other microwave residue, or some other residual effect. He told me: 'You
will then be in a privileged position, and we will put you right out there
as the number one crop circle expert.' He then said that they would send
me to a certain college. . . (which I know to be a government
establishment, so my ears pricked up at this point). . . where you will be
familiarized with coding structures. I mean, this is an absolute bloody
horror story I'm hearing ... I mean, I was . . . God, no one will ever
know how I felt that night. I was terrified. I even cried. I was
completely and utterly bloody freaked. I even saw my daughter the next day
and I broke down while I was talking to her, too. I said to her: 'Darling,
I want you to forget everything I've ever told you about crop circles. I
think I'm in terrible trouble. You know, I'm in bloody trouble.' Of
course, she didn't know what I was talking about but I just wanted my
family out of it. It took everything I knew to get over that ordeal and
carry on a relatively normal life . . .
(At this point Colin took a few
moments to himself. It was obvious that the ordeal had affected him very
deeply - indeed, that the memory was as painful as the ordeal itself. A
short while later we resumed.)
CA: ... So anyway ... I was
told that there would be another couple of contacts made and that these
would be 'voice-only' contacts via the telephone. And sure enough they
phoned me, but by this time I'd had time to think about the situation and
I'd decided I was going to take his head off, you know. There was no way I
was going to give them what they wanted.
JK: So what did you do?
CA: I was given a contact
number at the Ministry of Defence and I rang that number and told them
that I'd had this approach, but I was told they had no jurisdiction. Can
you believe that? A British subject was being harassed by a member of US
Intelligence and the MoD had no jurisdiction to protect me! My God! I
mean, it really made me ashamed to be British. Anyway, they also told me
that I was not to be concerned, that I should simply refuse to cooperate
with them. They said that if I refused to go along with it there should
not be any danger to me. Hah! I thought: Thanks for the invaluable
assistance!'
JK: And is that what you did?
CA: In the event, yes. That's
precisely what I did. I literally ignored the phone calls. And I guess, in
retrospect, it might just have saved my life, the fact that I'd contacted
the MoD. Perhaps they have a little more jurisdiction than they admitted
to. Perhaps the fact that I contacted the MoD meant that the CIA dared not
harm me in any way.
JK: So how did you know which
calls to ignore? How did you know it was them?
CA: Oh, it was them, all right.
The guy was on the answer machine saying: 'Pick up the phone. Pick up the
phone.' But I didn't. I just let it go. Then the voice said: 'Ring me back
at this number.' And then they gave a number, but I didn't ring back. A
few days later they phoned again, and this time what they said was vile,
and frightening. But my answer was: 'Sorry, I'm not playing.' And that was
that so far as I was concerned. Like I said, perhaps they knew I'd
contacted the MoD. Maybe, just maybe, this was enough for them to leave me
alone.
JK: Have you had similar
approaches since you moved to America?
CA: Well, nothing quite like
that. But I have certainly been approached, yes. A computer analyst at the
Pentagon, for example, approached me with a person called [name deleted].
Pretty soon this woman, [name deleted], sought [name deleted] out and
asked to see her in her office. Now this meant that my new office - which
I used to share with [name deleted] - had already been infiltrated by
people who we now know for sure were CIA. I have since had several
approaches by both of these people.
JK: Sounds like someone was
pretty desperate to gain access to your database.
CA: Absolutely. That's the only
possible answer. Well, I know that's what it was all about. They told me
so. For instance, [name deleted], who is an author in the US, offered that
I should co-author a book with her and she went to every extreme in order
to get me to agree. She wanted to work with me on the project in my office
here in Connecticut, which of course would have allowed her unlimited
access to my database. But again, I turned the offer down.
JK: Well, thank you for being
so frank, Colin. I'm sure you've opened a lot of people's minds about the
ways in which the world's intelligence agencies work and about just how
seriously they view the UFO and crop circle phenomena. Thanks once again.
CA: My pleasure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT HAPPENED TO COLIN?

By Michael Irving, owner of
World-Action and editor of Interesting Times
They got to him. Colin Andrews
was taken out of the Crop Pattern scene. All of us in the Wiltshire area
of southern England knew that ET was making the original Crop Patterns
and, at the end of the 1980s, even though Colin was being very
scientifically cautious, we knew that he knew too - and we were just
waiting for him to reveal to the world the immediate presence of ET in and
around the Earth - everywhere.
They must have found some way
to get to Colin. In the mid 1990s, it was revealed that Colin had suddenly
started working for a Rockefeller foundation and had been given a vast
fund and/or salary. Colin was a man of principle - that is why we all
liked him so much. Obviously they found a way to coerce Colin to keep
quiet about the ET connection. Colin travelled to the USA a lot. Perhaps
it was during one of these USA visits.
Colin had to be silenced. 100s
of millions of people worldwide had become interested in the
'out-of-this-world' Crop Patterns - they were not going to waste 50 years
concerted effort to confuse us about the reality we live in, to let just
one single man change the course of history.
CROP-PATTERN MESSAGES
HUMAN
RIGHT-BRAIN ATROPHY
 |